![]() Inappropriate sites include porn, as well as social networking sites such as MySpace or YouTube.įilters use a variety of techniques. A administrator gets an e-mail when inappropriate site access occurs. ![]() The noise is audible to everyone around, and it continues until the site is shut down. In Cuba, if a computer user at a government-controlled Internet cafe types certain words, the word processor or browser is automatically closed and the user gets a state-security warning.īy comparison, in Chicago, if a student or school employee accesses an inappropriate site, a siren sounds, similar to a warning of a natural disaster. is not alone enacting Internet filtering. Filtering should be limited to pornography, which is the only thing the law requires. But when filtering reaches the point that teachers and students are prevented from accessing materials that in their mind has educational value, that's more like censoring than filtering," Cunningham said. "I'm not arguing that all filtering is bad. In practice, local authorities generally install Web filtering from private vendors, who make the decisions what to filter on their own, often keeping the lists of censored sites secret.ĭespite the abuse, Cunningham said filtering is necessary. In theory, that leaves the rules up to state and local government and the teachers. ![]() government no oversight authority over the nature of the filters. The law requires filtering to protect children against "inappropriate" and "harmful materials" on the Internet, as well as protecting students' "safety and security" when using e-mail, chatrooms and "other forms of direct electronic communications." Because of First Amendment restrictions, the law gives U.S. law passed in 2001 covering public schools and libraries. Schools put filtering software in place as part of the requirement of the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), a U.S. "True learning occurs at the margins, true learning occurs at the situations where people encounter materials with which they're unfamiliar, and don't understand, and have misconceptions about." Do you prohibit students from accessing materials, or do you educate them by letting them access the materials?" he said. "It comes down to education versus prohibition. The sites that are edgiest are the most likely to be most educational. Instead of simply blocking sites, students should be permitted, or even encouraged, to access objectionable material, under teacher supervision, to help them learn, Cunningham said. Scroll down to the bottom of this post for details.) ![]() ( Disclaimer: I have a personal connection with the subject matter and hosts of this talk. Cunnningham gave a presentation in Second Life, part of a Smarter Technology series of educational talks. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |